The notification was one of a million.
She let it sit for a moment before grabbing the phone and bringing it to her face, expecting nothing more than a question from her co-worker or a response from the student she was helping. But the email — sent from Texas A&M’s Office of Open Records — was unusual: Under the state’s Public Information Act, she was being asked for copies of her syllabi and all emails she had sent containing the words “DEI” and “transgender.”
The professor’s main confusion came from the requestor, however. It was a name she had never seen before. Who would be interested in what was ultimately a few benign emails?
Her case wasn’t unique among faculty and staff. Representatives of Texas Scorecard, a right-wing website that publishes articles about state and local politics, submitted more than 100 open records requests to Texas A&M and the System from 2022-24.
“Virtually every article they publish is not fully factual, sometimes not even close to factual,” President Mark A. Welsh III told The Battalion in a sit-down interview in November 2024. “They have never printed a retraction when we provided them the facts.”
Scorecard’s posts, however, spread like wildfire.
“I do find it interesting in all the articles and things over the last couple of years, I think there have been maybe four or five courses that are taught here that they’ve called out, out of 4,600,” Welsh said. “So even if you made the assumption that there was something wrong with those courses, this is clearly a very specifically targeted effort for some reason, with some long-range purpose in mind. But you’d have to ask them. I don’t know what it is.”
Originally the print and online publishing arm of Empower Texans, a now-defunct advocacy group that spent millions pushing Republican priorities in the state legislature, Scorecard spun off into an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit in 2020 chaired by Tim Dunn, a West Texas oil billionaire — and one of the largest Republican donors in the state. His son-in-law Keith Uhles works as director, and the website’s top two roles are held by Aggies: publisher and president Michael Quinn Sullivan ‘92 and Chief Executive Officer Nathan Ofe ‘09.
Beyond online posts, podcasts and email lists, the website also hosts a directory of state politicians and ratings for each — where it derives its Scorecard branding from — created by the groups Young Conservatives of Texas and Texans For Fiscal Responsibility. The latter is a long-time affiliate of the expansive political machine Dunn funds and directs.
The authors of Scorecard’s posts — often hardline, conservative activists — submitted 94 open records requests to A&M and 23 to the A&M System from late 2022 to 2024, with a majority fueling the more than 100 stories the website has posted referencing the university since 2022. These requests target records of all types, including syllabi, funding numbers, communications containing specific keywords and certain statistics, like a December 2023 request for the number of hormone replacement therapy treatments University Health Services offered.
The December request spurred a two-part Scorecard series titled “Den of Degeneracy,” written by senior Scorecard writer Robert Montoya.
Montoya emailed the Board of Regents’ official email address on Jan. 24, 2024, and, in almost 1,800 words, detailed the information he collected on on-campus gender-affirming care, Transcend and Aggie Roses, independent student organizations that champion transgender rights and feminist values, respectively. The 10-member, governor-appointed board oversees the A&M System and its 11 universities, including the College Station campus.
Montoya asked 10 times whether certain details helped “secure the core educational mission of Texas A&M.” If not, he asked, “what are you going to do to return the university to its core educational mission?”
The group’s executive director forwarded the inquiry to each regent’s personal email on Jan. 26, 2024.
“When does our administration’s obsession with student sexual preferences and lifestyles finally stop?” Regent Mike Hernandez wrote when forwarding it to Welsh on Jan. 26, 2024. “Why is it any of their business and why do we allow the administration to continue to promote these liberal agendas that are clearly against the will of the Texas Legislature and of the vast majority of Texas taxpayers? This is the second time recently that this has come up and we were assured that this hold over [sic] nonsense from previous administrations is being eradicated.”

Hernandez then suggested having the Committee on Audit and Committee on Academic and Student Affairs, two regent-staffed groups, “make a plan to identify every misguided policy and practice like these and make sure they are eliminated ASAP.”
This isn’t the first time Scorecard’s work has been used by regents to advocate for policy and personnel changes. Messages and emails released as part of an internal investigation into the failed hiring of Kathleen McElroy ‘81 as A&M journalism director in 2023 show regent skepticism to her appointment was directly linked to a June 15, 2023, Scorecard article about her experience with diversity initiatives.
One regent, Sam Torn, emailed Regent Bill Mahomes the day after the article went live with a copy-pasted paragraph from the Scorecard story, saying, “This is a quote I would like explained prior to voting on [McElroy’s] tenure.”
“I thought the purpose of us starting a journalism department was to get high-quality Aggie journalist[s] with conservative values into the market,” Regent Jay Graham wrote in a June 16, 2023, text to then-President M. Katherine Banks, Chancellor John Sharp, Regent David Baggett and a fourth unidentified individual. “This won’t happen with someone like [McElroy] leading the department.”
The national scandal rocked the university, ousted a president and had a million-dollar conclusion. It also fueled the growth of the influential conservative alumni organization The Rudder Association, according to the organization’s president, Matt Poling ‘90.
By August 2024, a TRA-hosted leadership dinner attended by approximately 60 students — including Yell Leaders and notable student government officials — was headlined by influential conservative figures, including State Rep. Brian Harrison ‘04 (R-10); former Texas governor Rick Perry ‘72; Senate Education Committee Chair Brandon Creighton (R-4); and Brooke Rollins ‘94, whom President Donald Trump would nominate as agriculture secretary just months later. Earlier that year, then-Commandant Patrick Michaelis and Sullivan, Scorecard’s publisher, headlined a separate meeting.
“I met former student Michael Sullvan last year, as one of our board members is a friend of his and invited him to speak at our annual meeting,” Poling said. “Super nice guy who loves A&M. Often brings to light interesting issues on our campus that we did not even know about.”
By this point, TRA was using Scorecard’s content as catalysts for its advocacy.
As previously reported by The Battalion, an April 2024 email Poling sent to Sharp, Welsh and the regents cited Scorecard’s “Den of Degeneracy” series when listing over a dozen reasons why the university should end gender-affirming care on campus. A follow-up email from Clifford Hopewell, a TRA member and former president of the Texas Psychological Association, repeated the points and said it constituted “medical malpractice.”
New records obtained by The Battalion show that Welsh tasked Nancy Fahrenwald, the associate vice president for University Health Services, with leading a formal response to Hopewell on May 8, 2024.
“President may want us to refer students to the community for care,” Fahrenwald texted the next day to a group chat with Matt Hoffman and Tiffany Skaggs, two top UHS administrators. “How would we do that?”
Hoffman, an assistant dean at the nursing school, said Bryan-College Station was “GREATLY lacking in local providers” — especially after he closed his private practice several years ago, where he offered similar services.
“I hate to think of the financial burden, not to mention delay in care, that students would incur by having to go elsewhere,” Hoffman texted. “I know the both of you well enough that I feel comfortable sharing that the thought of having to send students away is heartbreaking to me.”
Skaggs concurred. But by May 17, 2024, records indicate UHS officials were drafting the letter they used to announce the decision in July. The cut was in effect by August.
In communications about Welsh’s permanent appointment to the presidency, Scorecard’s influence is also evident. A retired four-star general who served as Joint Chief of Staff over the U.S. Air Force, which at the time had 650,000 employees, he was called an “Obama appointee” and criticized by the website for his past comments supporting diversity initiatives. One former student emailed Welsh after reading a Scorecard story to say he was leading the university down a “WOKE path.”
“You clearly don’t know me at all,” Welsh fired back in an email response. “I have no idea what ‘WOKE path’ even means and I’m certainly not leading anyone down one.”
As Welsh’s permanent appointment in December 2023 neared, criticism ramped up. Regent John Bellinger emailed Regent Bob Albritton on Nov. 5, 2023, saying they “really need[ed] to vet this guy.”

“From what I have heard along with this and other articles, I have many questions,” Bellinger wrote after an alum emailed him a Scorecard post.
Baggett, having read a Scorecard story about Welsh’s goal of increasing the percentage of women in the military, sent the post’s link to the regents Torn, Bellinger and Brooks as well.
The opposition wouldn’t work, however. The nine regents unanimously confirmed Welsh as the university’s 27th president on Dec. 12, 2023. Yet over a year later, Scorecard remains a consistent presence on campus.
“It’s not in my decision process at all,” Welsh said. “As I said before, I do what’s best for Texas A&M. I don’t feel pressured, influenced by Texas Scorecard or anybody else who weighs in with an opinion. It’s an opinion. They rarely have all the facts.”
kathleen o'reilly • Feb 28, 2025 at 5:29 pm
Thanks, Batt journalists for keeping up the good work of informing the student body, the faculty and staff, and the general public about what happens behind the scenes that influences our day-to-day lives. Thanks for investigating what we could not! I hope you meet your fundraising goal. GIVE NOW!
Gavin Jackson • Feb 7, 2025 at 3:42 pm
Thank you for writing a well thought out article and for speaking up against the desperate attempt of ultra right ideologies to corner Texas A&M as their territory. I admire President Mark Welsh and have faith in his leadership. Texas A&M belong to all students and the only thing it should be known for is the wonderful academics it provides to our students.
Steven L. Hanson • Feb 7, 2025 at 1:04 pm
As a proud member of the Texas A&M University community, I am writing to express my thoughts on the importance of our institution’s conservative history and the pressing need for a renewal of journalistic ethics. It is imperative that Texas A&M University not only upholds its traditional values but also becomes a beacon of integrity in journalism both on campus and nationwide.
First and foremost, Texas A&M University has a rich conservative history that has shaped the character and values of countless Aggies. From our commitment to service, leadership, and excellence, to the principles of individual responsibility and freedom, our conservative heritage has fostered a strong sense of community and purpose. These values are not just historical relics but are integral to the identity of our university. It is essential that we continue to honor and promote these principles, ensuring that future generations of Aggies understand and appreciate the legacy they inherit.
In light of this, the recent article in The Battalion titled “They Rarely Have All the Facts: Behind the Scenes Conservative Influence on Aggieland Soars” highlights the importance of maintaining journalistic integrity. As members of a distinguished academic institution, it is our duty to ensure that the journalism practiced and consumed within our community adheres to the highest ethical standards. Accurate, unbiased, and well-researched reporting is crucial for fostering informed and thoughtful discourse.
Moreover, Texas A&M University has the potential to lead by example in promoting journalistic ethics. By emphasizing transparency, accountability, and accuracy in our reporting, we can set a standard for other universities and media outlets to follow. Currently our society is being rocked by the abandonment of journalistic ethics by it foremost institutions Texas A&M should lead by creating a new culture of ethical journalism on campus and then leading the nation back to ethical journalism.
In conclusion, Texas A&M University must embrace its conservative heritage while championing the renewal of journalistic ethics. By doing so, we can uphold the values that define us and become a leader in shaping the future of journalism. Let us take this opportunity to reaffirm our commitment to integrity, excellence, and the principles that have made Aggieland a place of pride and honor.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Syd • Feb 7, 2025 at 12:59 pm
Seeing the comments that are against DEI and humane treatment of students makes me scared to be a student 🙁
Stonewall Quackson • Feb 7, 2025 at 12:34 pm
“It’s absolutely disgusting they’re submitting open records requests to see what we’re doing”
Hahaha!
Universities not hotbeds of Marxist social extremism challenge: impossible
Gabelo Camiro • Feb 7, 2025 at 12:20 pm
The Rudder Association’s involvement in A&M’s affairs is disgusting and their obsession with “DEI” and the sexuality of a ridiculously small minority of the student body is laughable. The Alt-Right is a plague that works only to push hate and distract from the actual problems we face.
Mark • Feb 7, 2025 at 12:05 pm
Thank you for having spine during a time when our leadership is bending over and crying out “deeper, daddy!” to whoever they are afraid of.
Julia H • Feb 7, 2025 at 7:42 am
The politics of this school makes me sick sometimes
Amit • Feb 6, 2025 at 9:11 pm
Good work. I hope General Welsh’s passion for A&M and its students prevails, instead of the constant noise created by a few who don’t represent most students and parents of today. These same people also call UT a cesspool etc, but look at the outcomes of its students (Texans 90% by law) and its top reputation. Not sure why those from the past also want to hold A&M back.
Anna Miller • Feb 6, 2025 at 5:23 pm
I am the parent of two Aggies, and the actions of The Scorecard and The Board of Regents disgusts me. No wonder my children want little to do with their alma mater now that they’ve graduated. A&M is funded by taxpayer dollars — ALL TAXPAYERS.
Hunter • Feb 6, 2025 at 4:56 pm
Great article.