The Student News Site of Texas A&M University - College Station

The Battalion

The Student News Site of Texas A&M University - College Station

The Battalion

The Student News Site of Texas A&M University - College Station

The Battalion

Texas A&M University System Chancellor John Sharp attends the Class of 1972 50-year reunion in Kyle Field on April 20, 2022.
A&M System’s Title IX director suspended after supporting Biden's Title IX changes
Nicholas Gutteridge, Managing Editor • May 23, 2024
Mexico fans react after Mexico F Julián Quiñones 73rd-minute goal during the MexTour match between Mexico and Brazil at Kyle Field on Saturday, June 8, 2024. (Kyle Heise/The Battalion)
‘The stuff of dreams’
Ian Curtis, Sports Reporter • June 11, 2024

As soon as the Mexico-Brazil soccer match at Kyle Field was announced, Jacob Svetz and Caitlin Falke saw an opportunity.  The match was scheduled...

The Fighting Texas Aggie Band performs at halftime during Texas A&Ms football game against ULM at Kyle Field on Saturday, Sept. 16, 2023.
Gridiron glory to multi-event marvel
Shalina Sabih, Sports Writer • June 7, 2024

Special teams: Special events  “My favorite thing about an event is seeing the people come into the stadium and seeing their excitement...

Kennedy White, 19, sits for a portrait in the sweats she wore the night of her alleged assault inside the Y.M.C.A building that holds Texas A&M’s Title IX offices in College Station, Texas on Feb. 16, 2024 (Ishika Samant/The Battalion).
'I was terrified'
April 25, 2024
Chris Hemsworth as Dementus in Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga.
Review: ‘Furiosa’ is a must-see
Justin ChenJune 4, 2024

My jaw dropped open in 2016. Rarely in life does that happen, but the viewing experience of “Mad Max: Fury Road" was something to behold....

Texas A&M pitcher Chris Cortez (10) reacts during Texas A&M’s game against Oregon at the NCAA Bryan-College Station Super Regional at Olsen Field on Saturday, June 8, 2024. (CJ Smith/The Battalion)
One step away
June 8, 2024

Pull out


America goes to foreign lands to fight foreign enemies. President Bush said that the United States should “defeat the terrorists abroad so we don’t have to face them here at home.”
This claim is generally backed by words, symbols and abstract meanings. But saying “we are winning the war on terrorism” or “America is safer now that Saddam is gone” does not magically make it so.
Rather than argue and debate the theoretical underpinnings and conceptual references, the facts should be laid out and the mounting empirical evidence ought to do the talking.
Regarding protection of the United States from terrorism, a CNN/USA Today Gallup Poll reported that only 30 percent of Americans feel safer as a result of the United States’ military actions in Iraq. Obviously, security is not a resounding term Americans use to describe a world without Saddam in power.
Protecting the taxpayer is another downfall. Joseph E. Stiglitz, economist and Nobel Prize winner, predicted that the price tag for the Iraq war could be upwards of $2 trillion.
The current figure for Iraq is $271 billion, and it is not to be taken lightly. According to data computed by the National Priorities Project, the current figure could have been used for 13 million college scholarships, 11 years of fully funded global anti-hunger efforts and 27 years of fully funded world-wide AIDS programs. Even better, there could be a $2,000 tax cut for every taxpayer in America.
Most importantly, the troops on the front lines should receive the greatest protection, but the United States military has neglected to do this too. The New York Times reported in January 2006 that “a secret Pentagon study has found that at least 80 percent of the marines who have been killed in Iraq from wounds to their upper body could have survived if they had extra body armor.” The necessary body armor “has been available since 2003, but until recently the Pentagon has largely declined to supply it to troops.”
Furthermore, for many Americans there is no greater patriotic catch phrase than “support our troops.” The pro-war side demands blinded support for the president as America is in a time of war. However the anti-war side declares the best protection for the troops is in the comfort of their own homes, therefore bring them home. Can both sides disregard what they think is best and allow the troops to speak for themselves?
If Americans would stop bickering and listen, they may find that the troops are actually speaking for themselves. According to a January/February 2006 Zogby poll, “72 percent of American troops serving in Iraq think the U.S. should exit the country within the next year, and more than one in four say the troops should leave immediately.”
There is no better resource for understanding the situation in Iraq than the troops that are on the ground. Protecting their wishes and bringing the troops home serves a patriotic purpose – it supports the troops.
Another Sept. 11 is not necessary to recognize that damage has been done for years to come. Blood and treasure have already been lost. Continuing down the same path will only lead to more war, with only words to protect us.

Leave a Comment
Donate to The Battalion

Your donation will support the student journalists of Texas A&M University - College Station. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

More to Discover
Donate to The Battalion

Comments (0)

All The Battalion Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *