The Student News Site of Texas A&M University - College Station

The Battalion

The Student News Site of Texas A&M University - College Station

The Battalion

The Student News Site of Texas A&M University - College Station

The Battalion

Texas A&M University System Chancellor John Sharp attends the Class of 1972 50-year reunion in Kyle Field on April 20, 2022.
A&M System’s Title IX director suspended after supporting Biden's Title IX changes
Nicholas Gutteridge, Managing Editor • May 23, 2024
Mexico fans react after Mexico F Julián Quiñones 73rd-minute goal during the MexTour match between Mexico and Brazil at Kyle Field on Saturday, June 8, 2024. (Kyle Heise/The Battalion)
‘The stuff of dreams’
Ian Curtis, Sports Reporter • June 11, 2024

As soon as the Mexico-Brazil soccer match at Kyle Field was announced, Jacob Svetz and Caitlin Falke saw an opportunity.  The match was scheduled...

The Fighting Texas Aggie Band performs at halftime during Texas A&Ms football game against ULM at Kyle Field on Saturday, Sept. 16, 2023.
Gridiron glory to multi-event marvel
Shalina Sabih, Sports Writer • June 7, 2024

Special teams: Special events  “My favorite thing about an event is seeing the people come into the stadium and seeing their excitement...

Kennedy White, 19, sits for a portrait in the sweats she wore the night of her alleged assault inside the Y.M.C.A building that holds Texas A&M’s Title IX offices in College Station, Texas on Feb. 16, 2024 (Ishika Samant/The Battalion).
'I was terrified'
April 25, 2024
Chris Hemsworth as Dementus in Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga.
Review: ‘Furiosa’ is a must-see
Justin ChenJune 4, 2024

My jaw dropped open in 2016. Rarely in life does that happen, but the viewing experience of “Mad Max: Fury Road" was something to behold....

Texas A&M pitcher Chris Cortez (10) reacts during Texas A&M’s game against Oregon at the NCAA Bryan-College Station Super Regional at Olsen Field on Saturday, June 8, 2024. (CJ Smith/The Battalion)
One step away
June 8, 2024

Soldiers must finish tours regardless of contracts

Near the end of last year, a lawsuit was brought against the U.S. Army by eight soldiers challenging a policy that would extend their terms of active duty beyond contractual expiration. Commonly known as the stop-loss policy, it requires a soldier whose unit is to deploy during wartime to go with his unit and serve the full tour. Soldiers are notified 90 days before deployment. The catch is that if a soldier’s release date is to come after his 90 day notification, he will not be released according to contract, but instead will be deployed and serve.
If the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, the effects could be horrific. Thousands of years of military institution and practice will be slapped in the face. Overturning the stop-loss policy would send the message to regular troops that once their contract expires, they can stand up and walk out. The stop-loss policy was created to prevent that and serve other purposes as well, including no draft.
The plaintiffs do hold a legitimate argument for the complaint. Spc. David Qualls, one of the soldiers involved in the lawsuit, explained that he is not against the war.
“My job was to go over and perform my duties under the contract I signed. But my year is up and it’s been up. Now I believe that they should honor their end of the contract,” Qualls said.
However, several issues weaken Qualls’ stance. First, as Lt. Col. Pamela Hart explains, the policy is written in the enlistment contract.
“It says that soldiers may be required to serve on active duty for the entire period of the war or emergency and for six months after its end,” Quall said. “The whole contract is quite explanatory in that if the military needs you during a period of service, war, that you as a volunteer soldier have an obligation to serve.”
Secondly, an enlistment contract is not a standard business contract. The purpose of military in the United States was perhaps best stated by Jack Nicholson: “(This) is the business of saving lives.” The contracts that soldiers such as Qualls have signed have stipulated certain tasks and duties; however, his job, such as all other soldiers, is to protect America. That job is not done.
That is not to say that the military should ignore all enlistment contracts until the war is over. It simply means that as long as one’s unit is in battle, he must fight alongside his unit. A piece of paper with a date and signature cannot be used as a reason to leave. To get up and leave in the middle of a fight can have no justification.
The final blow to the plaintiffs’ defense is the purpose of the stop-loss policy itself. The purpose is cohesion. “If someone next to you is new, it can be dangerous,” Hart said. “The bottom line of this is unit cohesion. This way, the units deploy together, train together, fight together and come home together.”
Replacing a large number of troops in the middle of a mission is dangerous. When men train together, they learn about each other, including each others’ personalities and even sleep habits. Support groups are formed. Daily duties become routine. People learn how to work off each other’s habits. Throwing 1000 new recruits into a unit that has been together for six months breaks all the routines and rituals that unit was accustomed to.
The army is not just an expendable, faceless or soulless mass. It is a society, with each individual playing his role and making a contribution. Though common duties can be performed by any soldier, the importance in the business of saving lives is not just the end result, but also the means to this end. Furthermore, having to watch many of one’s friends leave halfway through a tour while stuck for another year is difficult to handle.
The stop-loss policy is clearly a vital component to the efficiency and strength of the U.S. military. A soldier cannot simply say, “I’m out,” or file a suit against the military when his commanding officers give an order contradicting his interest. Qualls and the other soldiers should be given great respect for the services they have performed to protect America, but the courts cannot invite a potentially dangerous cascade effect by ruling in their favor.

Leave a Comment
Donate to The Battalion

Your donation will support the student journalists of Texas A&M University - College Station. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

More to Discover
Donate to The Battalion

Comments (0)

All The Battalion Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *